Krasava Kirill22092, I'm a little late, but with counter-arguments.Ī lot of spaceoptimize and I don't know how to say, and graphics-that is, are two different things. And if it has less cores, this does not mean that he is worse than AMD with its 8 cores.Īnd about the driver, and cleaning of debris, this advice is good, however ,cleaning of debris, there is unlikely to lead to higher productivity, then the question of the resources used all of this garbage. Meanwhile, not only the number of cores determines the performance of the processor, but the architecture and frequency of the processor, along with the technology, or the structure of its production. Simply, to reduce the physical size of transistors and increasing their density. Because of the increasing number of transistors in the processor it is necessary to reduce the technical production process.
He could not and assume that in 2014 the difficulty of compliance with this law will begin in the Intel. Presenting the law to the public, one of the fathers of Intel could not assume that the engineers for the last fifty years will be able to stick to it. The number of transistors placed on a chip integrated circuit doubles every 24 months, leading to the emergence of new technologies, productivity growth and breakthroughs in the field of electronics". Those same games usually can't upload more than four cores, the result exposes the weaknesses of the Bulldozer cores separately.Īnd it seemed to me that the number of transistors affect the performance of the processor, the news: Such may include, for example rendering (rendering) video, or server-side calculations.īut when the CPU goes single-threaded load, due to the same flaw of microarchitecture bulldozer often loses to opponents from Intel. These same 8 cores, would be of great help in problems where you need a powerful work with high-quality multi-threaded load. Today, the same 8-core AMD for gaming is redundant is redundant is the number of cores, but performance falls short, but they have other advantages. But, in principle, for games now the best solution is a 4 core processor.
FAR CRY PRIMAL PC SIZE CODE
But then POPs up the same bit of a situation: not all games have optimized code 4-nuclear processors, and if optimized, it is not as effective as you'd like. When it comes to gaming performance, then here, to feel comfortable in most games need 4 cores or more. Professor in the future, I'll certainly have a degree, but try to use Google, he read and learn, and so, according to the cores, an excerpt from the article: And in the minimum salary and does 1 GB VRAM.
In this video, the processor is loaded within 50% of the video card on 99%, which suggests that it copes with its task to CHEER.Ģ GB these settings are enough people playing, and the video memory in the video clip, uploaded 1,57 GB to 1.7 GB.
FAR CRY PRIMAL PC SIZE 1080P
Meanwhile, all tested us:įar Cry Primal - i5 4460 - 8GB RAM - GTX 750 Ti - 1080p - 90. And to throw such statements need to check the programs. Actually this CPU 4 cores + 4 threads, as I have already mentioned.
Petty quibbling, of course.Īnd still, Intel processors are not very good for games, the whole load is on 2-4 cores from Intel and they fail, causing the computer lag and That nonsense. Meanwhile, the i5-4460 has 4 cores+4 threads, antivirus he does not deliver.ĭuring the game try to put antivirusnik ( if any of Course, if not, then buy and you need to check your computer - what? What do you recommend to turn it off, then going to clean the garbage. There is an exception, for example, RamDisk.Īntivirusnik eats somewhere between 6-10% of the CPU power - what? About the CPU load of the question. And 32 is a waste of money, and especially the 64 GB is all nonsense. I have 32 GB, I speak as a fan of wasting RAM that 16-22 GB, this is the ideal at the moment, I rarely crossed the threshold over 22 GB. Ideal 32-64 GB 32 GB, and the more 64? Nothing requests.